When indicators disagree: separating missing from conflicting evidence in cross-country rankings of student mobility

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22755541

Palabras clave:

composite indicators, source disagreement, multiple imputation, international student mobility, tertiary education finance, rank uncertainty

Resumen

Missing evidence, disagreement between statistical producers and divergence between indicators can be told apart in cross-country education statistics; the distinction exposes rank uncertainty that multiple imputation on one producer's values does not represent, but did not improve a ranking-based decision. We downloaded from OECD, UNESCO Institute for Statistics and World Bank interfaces the inbound mobility rate, government expenditure per tertiary student and government tertiary expenditure as a share of GDP for 42 countries. A rule whose threshold was chosen after exploring 2013-2016 classified 252 country-years in 2017-2022 as concordant (42.9%; 95% CI 30.6-55.2), producers disagreeing (25.8%; 16.3-36.1), indicators diverging (15.1%) or missing (16.3%). Producer disagreement mixes definitional differences with numerical conflict: removing the systematic OECD-UNESCO level difference lowers its share to 15.9%. Mobility rates coincided across producers. Putting UNESCO values first moved disagreeing country-years by 10.4 rank positions (95% CI 5.8-15.9) and concordant ones by 2.9. That rank fell outside the 95% multiple-imputation interval for 66.1% of disagreeing and 35.2% of concordant country-years (difference 31.0 points, 7.3-53.5, country bootstrap within this convenience panel); without the check that removed one impossible OECD value the difference was 16.0 points (-4.4 to 34.1). Abstaining on non-concordant evidence did not reduce next-year reversals of a top-10 flag relative to abstaining near the cut-off (3.3% versus 0.0%; Holm-adjusted p = 0.27).

Referencias

[1] A. Matheu Pérez, R. Cortés, A. Carrier, and C. Sebrango, "Contributions of educational investment to international student mobility: A multivariate and neutrosophic analysis of educational service quality in OECD data," Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 89, pp. 357-374, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16636867.

[2] D. B. Rubin, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1987, doi: 10.1002/9780470316696.

[3] C. F. Manski, Partial Identification of Probability Distributions. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2003, doi: 10.1007/b97478.

[4] A. B. Atkinson and A. Brandolini, "Promise and pitfalls in the use of “secondary” data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 771-799, 2001, doi: 10.1257/jel.39.3.771.

[5] S. Johnson, W. Larson, C. Papageorgiou, and A. Subramanian, "Is newer better? Penn World Table revisions and their impact on growth estimates," Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 255-274, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.022.

[6] OECD and European Commission Joint Research Centre, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2008, doi: 10.1787/9789264043466-en.

[7] M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola, "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 307-323, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x.

[8] P. Paruolo, M. Saisana, and A. Saltelli, "Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or science?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 609-634, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x.

[9] M. Mogstad, J. P. Romano, A. M. Shaikh, and D. Wilhelm, "Inference for ranks with applications to mobility across neighbourhoods and academic achievement across countries," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 476-518, 2024, doi: 10.1093/restud/rdad006.

[10] S. P. Jenkins, "World income inequality databases: An assessment of WIID and SWIID," The Journal of Economic Inequality, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 629-671, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10888-015-9305-3.

[11] S. van Buuren and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, "mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 45, no. 3, 2011, doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03.

[12] M. Beine, R. Noël, and L. Ragot, "Determinants of the international mobility of students," Economics of Education Review, vol. 41, pp. 40-54, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.03.003.

[13] A. Abbott and M. Silles, "Determinants of international student migration," The World Economy, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 621-635, 2016, doi: 10.1111/twec.12319.

[14] E. Ovchinnikova, C. Van Mol, and E. Jones, "The role of language proximity in shaping international student mobility flows," Globalisation, Societies and Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 563-574, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14767724.2022.2070132.

[15] J. Bound, B. Braga, G. Khanna, and S. Turner, "A passage to America: University funding and international students," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 97-126, 2020, doi: 10.1257/pol.20170620.

[16] J. Bound, B. Braga, G. Khanna, and S. Turner, "The globalization of postsecondary education: The role of international students in the US higher education system," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 163-184, 2021, doi: 10.1257/jep.35.1.163.

[17] K. Shih, "Do international students crowd-out or cross-subsidize Americans in higher education?," Journal of Public Economics, vol. 156, pp. 170-184, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.10.003.

[18] S. Machin and R. Murphy, "Paying out and crowding out? The globalization of higher education," Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1075-1110, 2017, doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbx006.

[19] M. Beine, G. Peri, and M. Raux, "International college students’ impact on the US skilled labor supply," Journal of Public Economics, vol. 223, Art. no. 104917, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104917.

[20] OECD, "Tuition fee reforms and international mobility," Education Indicators in Focus, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2017, doi: 10.1787/2dbe470a-en.

[21] M. Parey and F. Waldinger, "Studying abroad and the effect on international labour market mobility: Evidence from the introduction of ERASMUS," The Economic Journal, vol. 121, no. 551, pp. 194-222, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02369.x.

[22] M. Lörz, N. Netz, and H. Quast, "Why do students from underprivileged families less often intend to study abroad?," Higher Education, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 153-174, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9943-1.

[23] H. Cebolla-Boado, Y. Hu, and Y. N. Soysal, "Why study abroad? Sorting of Chinese students across British universities," British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 365-380, 2018, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2017.1349649.

[24] R. Choudaha, "Three waves of international student mobility (1999–2020)," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 825-832, 2017, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1293872.

[25] C. R. Glass and N. I. Cruz, "Moving towards multipolarity: Shifts in the core-periphery structure of international student mobility and world rankings (2000–2019)," Higher Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 415-435, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00841-9.

[26] K. R. Gabriel, "The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis," Biometrika, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 453-467, 1971, doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453.

[27] I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, "Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2065, Art. no. 20150202, 2016, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.

[28] W. Becker, M. Saisana, P. Paruolo, and I. Vandecasteele, "Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap," Ecological Indicators, vol. 80, pp. 12-22, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056.

[29] S. Greco, A. Ishizaka, M. Tasiou, and G. Torrisi, "On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness," Social Indicators Research, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 61-94, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9.

[30] A. Saltelli, "Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy," Social Indicators Research, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 65-77, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-0024-9.

[31] M. Saisana, B. d'Hombres, and A. Saltelli, "Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications," Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 165-177, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003.

[32] J. G. Kelley and B. A. Simmons, "Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations," American Journal of Political Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 55-70, 2015, doi: 10.1111/ajps.12119.

[33] H. Goldstein and D. J. Spiegelhalter, "League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), vol. 159, no. 3, p. 385, 1996, doi: 10.2307/2983325.

[34] P. Hall and H. Miller, "Using the bootstrap to quantify the authority of an empirical ranking," The Annals of Statistics, vol. 37, no. 6B, 2009, doi: 10.1214/09-AOS699.

[35] D. B. Rubin, "Inference and missing data," Biometrika, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 581-592, 1976, doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.

[36] R. J. A. Little and D. B. Rubin, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2019, doi: 10.1002/9781119482260.

[37] J. Honaker and G. King, "What to do about missing values in time-series cross-section data," American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 561-581, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x.

[38] R. Lall, "How multiple imputation makes a difference," Political Analysis, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 414-433, 2016, doi: 10.1093/pan/mpw020.

[39] J. Josse and F. Husson, "missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 70, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.18637/jss.v070.i01.

[40] F. Solt, "The Standardized World Income Inequality Database," Social Science Quarterly, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1267-1281, 2016, doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12295.

[41] R. J. Barro and J. W. Lee, "A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010," Journal of Development Economics, vol. 104, pp. 184-198, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.001.

[42] D. Cohen and M. Soto, "Growth and human capital: Good data, good results," Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51-76, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10887-007-9011-5.

[43] A. de la Fuente and R. Doménech, "Human capital in growth regressions: How much difference does data quality make?," Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-36, 2006, doi: 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.1.1.

[44] N. D. Belnap, "A useful four-valued logic," in Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein, Eds. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1977, pp. 5-37, doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-1161-7_2.

[45] D. Dubois, "On ignorance and contradiction considered as truth-values," Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 195-216, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jigpal/jzn003.

[46] D. Ciucci, D. Dubois, and J. Lawry, "Borderline vs. unknown: Comparing three-valued representations of imperfect information," International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1866-1889, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2014.07.004.

[47] K. J. Kaplan, "On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 361-372, 1972, doi: 10.1037/h0032590.

[48] A. N. Uma, T. Fornaciari, D. Hovy, S. Paun, B. Plank, and M. Poesio, "Learning from disagreement: A survey," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 72, pp. 1385-1470, 2021, doi: 10.1613/jair.1.12752.

[49] C. Chow, "On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41-46, 1970, doi: 10.1109/TIT.1970.1054406.

[50] B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1994, doi: 10.1201/9780429246593.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-09-14

Número

Sección

Disagreement as signal